Skip to main content

What is contestable market theory and limit pricing and does the coffee market being more contestable help customers?

The contestable market theory is an economic theory that proposes that a market is competitive as long as it is easy for firms to enter and exit. According to this theory, even if there are only a few firms in a market, if it is easy for new firms to enter and existing firms to exit, the market will behave competitively. This is because the threat of new entrants and the possibility of existing firms exiting will provide an incentive for firms to keep prices low and quality high in order to remain competitive.

Watch this video for an explanation of contestable markets for CIE A2 and all you need to know:



Limit pricing is a common pricing strategy that involves setting prices at a level that is low enough to deter new firms from entering a market, but high enough to cover the costs of existing firms. Firms may use limit pricing in order to protect their market share and prevent new entrants from gaining a foothold in the market. Prices are set at ATC = AR when the market is perfectly contestable, either to stave off the competition from entering or in the long run, as the market will reach normal profits if economic profits are available and entry is possible.

If the coffee market were to become more contestable, it could potentially be better for customers in a number of ways. First, increased competition would likely lead to lower prices for coffee, as firms compete to attract customers by offering lower prices. Second, increased competition may also lead to higher-quality coffee, as firms seek to differentiate themselves from their competitors and attract customers through the quality of their products. Increasing the contestability in the coffee market may also lead to more innovation and product diversity, as firms seek to offer new and unique products to attract customers, such as a mocha-choca-ice-latte with marshmallows and chocolate sauce...!!

How does this look in reality?

It is difficult to generalise how contestable market theory plays out in reality, as the degree to which a market is contestable will depend on a variety of factors, such as the cost of entry, the availability of substitutes, and the extent of government regulation.

In some cases, markets may be highly contestable, with a large number of firms operating and a low barrier to entry. This can lead to intense competition and a high level of dynamism, with firms constantly seeking to attract customers through lower prices, higher quality, and innovation. In other cases, markets may be less contestable, with a smaller number of firms operating and a higher barrier to entry. This can lead to less competition and potentially higher prices, as firms have less incentive to lower prices in order to attract customers.

It is important to note that the concept of contestable market theory is a theoretical one and does not always hold true in practice. There are many examples of markets that are dominated by a few large firms, yet still, exhibit competitive behaviour due to the threat of new entrants or the possibility of existing firms exiting. Similarly, there are examples of markets that are highly contestable, yet still exhibit less than ideal levels of competition due to factors such as collusion or limit-pricing.

But what about that coffee stall set up out the back of the truck in the video?

It is possible that opening a coffee stall out the back of a truck could be considered an example of a contestable market, depending on the circumstances. In order for a market to be considered contestable, there must be low barriers to entry and exit, meaning that it should be relatively easy for new firms to enter the market and for existing firms to exit...I guess coffee meets this criteria.

For a coffee stall out the back of a truck, the barriers to entry may be low if the startup costs are relatively small and there are few regulatory hurdles to overcome. If it is easy for new firms to enter the market and set up their own coffee stalls, the market can therefore be considered contestable.

However, it is important to note that the degree of contestability in a market will depend on a variety of factors, and a market may not be considered fully contestable even if it exhibits some of the characteristics of a contestable market. For example, if the competition in the market is fierce and there are many other coffee stalls operating in the area, the market may not be considered fully contestable even if the barriers to entry are low.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A chat with a world class economist...Jia Yi!

It is always great to hear how students are getting on as they progress through life, moving on to bigger and better things... Many of our students at GIS go on to study at some of the world's best universities and it was wonderful to hear from Jia Yi Lim, who recently moved from Malaysia to the USA and is now settling into life at Harvard University. When in Year 13, Jia Yi was over-the-moon to have received offers from Harvard, Stanford and Cambridge ...having only made 3 applications! Harvard was chosen in the end, but it was certainly a decision which took considerable time, a lot of thought and careful deliberation. In only her first semester at Harvard, Jia Yi is loving life. Having been fortunate enough to have taught her A Level Economics as well as enjoy watching her debate and witnessed her incredible community service work ( Project Smile ), I thought I knew what Jia Yi was capable of. However, her contributions so far at Harvard, as I am sure you'll agree, a

What’s the difference between business and economics?

Every year, as we go through the Options process (IGCSE and A Level), parents and students alike have hundreds of questions. And rightly so, the decision is important. But one question we hear multiple times every year is:  "What's the difference between business and economics?" ...and more often than not, this question includes accounting. This post hopes to shed some light on this and help explain the main differences.  At GIS, we like to use an analogy given to us a few years ago by another economics teacher (Mr Stewart...credit where credit is Stew!)…   First, let's talk about Business Studies . Business studies delves into the core areas related to businesses and their operations. The buying, selling, producing and marketing of goods and services.  Imagine a business, let's say it is a factory. Visualise lifting the roof off and peering inside; you see four main sections each with very different things going on... In one area, there is a team of people using

The Economics of Attendance: The key to examination success?

In the bustling world of academics where examinations, assignments, homework and extracurricular activities all clamour for your time and attention, it’s easy to underestimate the power of a seemingly simple act: showing up . A dig into the research has led me to believe that there is so much more to the relationship between attendance and academic achievement than the obvious and strong positive correlation we often talk about here in GIS. A full class! Where IGCSE and A-level subject results are concerned, it seems that attendance is way more than just a formality; it's a strategic investment with very tangible returns. Plenty of studies point towards this; a recent UK government blog post called " Why is school attendance so important and what are the risks of missing a day? " is very clear in its answer: attendance is paramount and the risks of missing a day are high! Every day at school is crucial and missed days can accumulate rapidly according to the article, whic